‘The Port of Assab is Eritrean, but Ethiopia Should Have Right to Use it’: Herman Cohn

Audio News Video
Ambassador Herman Cohen
For the last 16 years, Eritrean development goal plans do not include providing port services nor trade with Ethiopia. Our Ports are not for Sale!

By VOA News,

FORMER U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs Herman Cohen said he wanted to set the record straight about his recommendation during the 1991 London Conference on Ethiopia, Eritrea and Port Assab.

He said he did not say the port belongs to Ethiopia, contrary to what some in Ethiopia had attributed to him, and that he only recommended Ethiopia and Eritrea maintain a common economic union after Eritrea’s independence allowing Ethiopia to use the port.

“There are some people in Ethiopia who said that during the London Conference of 1991 I recommended that the Port of Assab belonged to Ethiopia. This is not correct. What I recommended was Ethiopia and Eritrea maintain a common economic union after Eritrea’s independence and, in that way, Ethiopia could use the Port of Assab,” he said.

Cohen said that before the war of 1998, Ethiopia used a section of the port for their imports and exports, which means that Assab did not belong to Ethiopia, but it had access to an exclusive zone.

– – – – – – –
ALSO READ : The Port of Assab: With or Without Ethiopia
– – – – – – –

He said the port should be the sovereign territory of Eritrea, but that Ethiopia should have the right to use it.

(Click the audio player below to listen the interview)

– – – – – – – –
– – – – – – – –


Article 125 : Right of access to and from the sea and freedom of transit

1. Land-locked States [Ethiopia] shall have the right of access to and from the sea for the purpose of exercising the rights provided for in this Convention including those relating to the freedom of the high seas and the common heritage of mankind. To this end, land-locked States shall enjoy freedom of transit through the territory of transit States [Eritrea] by all means of transport.

2. The terms and modalities for exercising freedom of transit shall be agreed between the land-locked States [Ethiopia] and transit States [Eritrea] concerned through bilateral, sub-regional or regional agreements.

3. Transit States [Eritrea], in the exercise of their full sovereignty over their territory, shall have the right to take all measures necessary to ensure that the rights and facilities provided for in this Part for land-locked States [Ethiopia] shall in no way infringe their legitimate interests.